There has been a child sexual abuse case brought to the headlines recently after it transpired the offender was given a suspended sentence due to his victim being labelled a "sexual predator".
A thirteen year old girl being abused by a forty one year old man is an abuse victim not a sexual predator.
The forty one year old man was given a suspended sentence.
Even though, on top of abusing a child, he was charged with MAKING, yes MAKING images of abused children.
Yet his VICTIM was accused and his sentence suspended.
This is absolutely disgusting, abhorrent behaviour on the part of the judge to agree with the victimisation of a child and ignoring the man had also MADE images of abused children.
The only conclusion I can come up with is the judge themselves sees children as sexual beings and not as children capable of being ABUSED by paedophiles.
A judge calling a child a sexual predator screams red flags as a non abuser would not be able to comprehend a CHILD as a predator.
A judge making observations like that should not be allowed to preside over cases of sexual abuse which involve children especially and an investigation should be made into the images the man made.
Where are the children abused in the images?
Who did the man supply the images to?
This case is a sad and dangerous situation, sad that there could be more than one victim and dangerous because it shows there are more paedophiles and victims involved.
The justice system needs to acknowledge the abusers and abuse apologists within their industry and enforce a standard of behaviour set to ensure that abusers and apologists are not allowed to work on cases where they can further abuse victims.
This is why victims do not come forward. There is no protection in the justice system.
No comments:
Post a Comment